How the Democrats Are Planning to Go After Judge Alito
First off, the plan to use his membership in the conservative organization Concerned Alumni for Princeton against him.
THE DRUDGE REPORT has obtained a Summer 1982 article from CAP?s PROSPECT magazine titled ?Smearing The Class Of 1957? that key Senate Democrats believe could thwart his nomination!
In the article written by then PROSPECT editor Frederick Foote, Foote writes: ?The facts show that, for whatever reasons, whites today are more intelligent than blacks.?
Senate Democrats expect excerpts like this written by other Princeton graduates will be enough to torpedo the Alito nomination.
One Democrat Hill staffer involved in their strategy declared, ?Put a fork in Scalito. It doesn?t matter that Alito didn?t write it, it doesn?t matter that Alito wasn?t that active in the group, Foote wrote it in CAP?s magazine and we are going to make Alito own it.?
Their second tactic will be using freelance journalist Stephen Dujack as a witness.
But as Drudge points out, Dujack is a moonbat.
However, THE DRUDGE REPORT has learned the Democrats? star witness comes with baggage of his own. Dujack penned an op-ed in 2003 that compared farm animals to Holocaust victims and gave money to the Kerry presidential campaign.
In the April 21, 2003 LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dujack wrote: ?Like the victims of the Holocaust, animals are rounded up, trucked hundreds of miles to the kill floor and slaughtered.? Dujack went on, ?To those who defend the modern-day Holocaust on animals by saying that animals are slaughtered for food and give us sustenance, I ask: if the victims of the Holocaust had been eaten, would that have justified the abuse and murder??
THE DRUDGE REPORT has also uncovered a purported $2,000 donation Dujack made to John Kerry?s presidential campaign in 2004.
The Democrats must be getting very desperate if all they can come up with is Alito’s membership in CAP, and the rantings of a PETA-esque moonbat. I guess they were spooked at the news of the American Bar Association giving Judge Alito a “well qualified” rating, which is their absolute highest rating. Furthermore, Neal Boortz points out that the ABA is never a crowd to be associated with the right.
Poor Dems. They’ll no longer be able to use judges to give them what voters won’t.