One Odd Lawsuit
How is it possible to sue a dog?
The Urban Grind
Current events, politics and life in general from the perspective of a conservative woman in New York
2 Responses to “One Odd Lawsuit”
Meta
Everywhere Else
- Ace of Spades
- Barking Moonbat Early Warning System
- Common Sense Junction
- Debbie Schlussel
- Flopping Aces
- Hard Astarboard
- Isophorone
- JBlog Central
- Jewish Defense League UK
- Jumping In Pools
- Mover Mike
- Opinion Forum
- Saber Point
- The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
- The Pickle
- The Real Sporer
- The Steel Deal
- The Truth
- Urban Grounds
- Wild Thing
- Woman Honor Thyself
- Yid With Lid
New York Bloggers
- Alarming News
- Atlas Shrugs
- CST Warrior
- Harley’s Cars
- Nicholas Stix Uncensored
- Pundit Press
- Sultan Knish
- The Silent Majority No More
- The Vigilant Squirrel Brigade
Other Sites of Interest
2007 Weblog Awards Finalist
Categories
- 2012 Presidential Election
- Abortion
- Activist Judges
- Animal Rights
- Anti-Semitism
- Arts and Entertainment
- Ayn Rand
- Bad Fashion
- Business
- Capital Punishment
- Capitalism
- Child Abuse
- Civil Liberties
- Criminals
- Donks
- Elections
- Enviro-wackos
- Ethics
- Eurabia
- Europeons
- Fellow Bloggers
- Feminism
- Good Judges
- Gun Ownership
- Health
- Health Care
- Heroes
- Hezbos
- Hollyweird
- Humor
- Intelligence
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islamist Fanatics
- Israel
- Jorge Wahabi Bush
- Kooky New Yorkers
- Labor Unions
- llegal Immigration
- Lousy-ana
- Marxists
- Me
- Media Bias
- Metrosexuals
- Michelle Obama
- Midterm Election
- Military
- Miscellaneous
- Mitt Romney
- Mohammed Cartoons
- Moonbats
- Morality
- NYC News
- NYC Politics
- Obamalinsky Administration
- Occuturds
- Odd News
- Oil/Energy
- Palewhinians
- Personal Responsibility
- Political Correctness
- Presidential Elections
- Public Schools
- Race Pimps
- Racial/Ethnic Profiling
- Religion
- Republicans
- RINO's
- Science News
- Social Security
- Stoopid People
- Supreme Court
- Taxes
- Technical Issues
- Technology
- The Economy
- True Conservatives
- TSA Perverts and Voyeurs
- Uncategorized
- United Nations
- University Wackos
- War on Terror
- World News
December 14th, 2005 at 11:02 pm
That’s what lawyers do these days. Sue anyone with legs in the hope that someone will settle to get rid of the lawyer.
December 15th, 2005 at 1:32 pm
Actually, this case makes a certain twisted sense …
Police always claim that police dogs are officers when evidence supression is discussed. If the dog is an “officer”, then scent evidence without probable cause is admissable. If the dog is not an “officer”, then the dog would be a “detection device” in excess of the policemen’s normal senses, and would require a warrant to use.
The police must either admit the dog is property, and thus cannot be used for warrentless searches, or maintain that the dog is an officer, and allow the suit to go forward … which will probably mean the convict will own an $8000 police dog, and can either sell it, or have it put down.