Ft. Hood Terrorist Was On Advisory Panel For Obama’s Transition
Wherever there are Muslim terrorists, Barack Obama is sure to be somehow involved. In this case, the Muslim terrorist shooter Nadal Malik Hasan was on an advisory panel for Obama’s transition.
The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute’s presidential transition task force last year.
The task force was not officially affiliated with the White House. It was a project of the Homeland Security Policy Institute, an independent thinktank housed at George Washington University, aimed at drafting policy recommendations for the incoming Obama administration.
According to the task force’s May 2009 report [pdf], a “Nidal Hasan” from the Uniformed Services University School of Medicine was a task force event participant. Other participants included Senate and House staffers, Department of Homeland Security officials, Defense Department officials, and reporters for Politico, the Washington Post, and the London Times.
November 6th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
The sooner he dies, the better.
November 6th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
The person who appointed him should be shot for treason.
That dirty arab wore full islamic garb.
November 6th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
It’s a shame he’s still alive.
November 6th, 2009 at 10:51 pm
Politics and the PC police have seeped so far into the military that, even when the guy tells his superior officer what he’s really thinking the rank ignores it and hence, the battle in the WOT that we saw yesterday.
Thank you, presidents Carter and Clinton (and to some extent both Bushes). Thank you all you idiot, narcissistic, self-centered and universe-centric liberals for forcing our nation to a point where stupidity like yours causes such needless death.
Zelda, I hope this one gets through. I’m so angry I could spit nails across the country at a certain East coast United States city not officially in any state! The magnificent innocence of the unthinking, uncaring liberals is incredible.
November 6th, 2009 at 11:40 pm
Hi Carlos! The commenting works!
November 7th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
Glad it wasn’t something I said!
BTW, how many articles have you all read that don’t mention the “holy” Quu’ran? I’ve read several, both online and in our local fishwrap, and have yet to see one where that wasn’t mentioned at least once.
When’s the last time you saw a reference in the MSM to the “Holy Bible”? Days? Weeks? Decades?
And the chorus of “He isn’t representative of Muslims!” is almost deafening now, led by the believer-in-chief. My bet is the gullible public will lap it up with unquenchable thirst.
November 8th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Agree with all the above comments.
Just as a note, the guy “attended” the conference along with many others. We do not know that he offered any input, and, if he did, that the input was taken into account (that is paraphrasing a WND article). Let’s hope not. I am not making excuses or in any way justifying his actions; merely getting the facts straight. I have read some wild shit that he was appointed as a personal adviser to Duh One, etc., and I don’t want the facts to get lost.
(Now to hit the button and see if the commenting works).