WARNING! — Acorn Agents To Infiltrate Tea Parties To Instigate Violence
Reader Carlos wrote in the comments of my earlier tea party post for people to watch out for the ACORN infiltrators. Carlos is not the only one giving out a warning.
A woman I’m acquainted with from the New York right wing circuit emailed me the following:
DEAR FELLOW TEA PARTY ATTENDEES,
THE NEW YORK STATE CONSERVATIVE PARTY AND RIGHT STATE DOT COM (YES THAT’S RIGHT. WE HAVE A CONSERVATIVE PARTY ON THE BALLOT IN NY STATE) HAS LEARNED THAT OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION IN ITS TIES TO ACORN (BILLIONS OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS IN THE PORKULUS BILL FUNDING THIS THUG GROUP) PLANS TO INFILTRATE THE NATIONAL TEA PARTIES TO CAUSE VIOLENCE.
THE ACORN AGENT PROVACATEURS WILL BE DRESSED LIKE THE REST OF US BUT WILL INSTILL VIOLENCE.IF YOU ARE ATTENDING A PARTY TODAY, PLEASE DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING WHATSOEVER FROM ANYBODY!!
THE OBAMA NAZI REGIME IS TRYING TO COLLECT NAMES BECAUSE BEING THE FASCIST/NAZI OBAMA IS, HE IS GOING TO STAMP OUT OPPOSITION.
AGAIN, DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING…IF ANYONE APPROACHES YOU FOR A SIGNATURE, OR IF YOU SEE ANYONE TRY TO INSTILL VIOLENCE…IT IS SUGGESTED YOU CARRY A SIGN WITH AN UPSIDE DOWN ACORN ON IT…YOU HOLD THE SIGN UP HIGH, SO THE PRESS CAN SEE THE ACORN SIGN AND KNOW THAT IT IS NOT US THAT IS CAUSING THE VIOLENCE.
THE NAZI MEMO THAT WENT OUT YESTERDAY FROM THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION ASKING FOR THE ARREST AND SURVEILLENCE OF ANYONE WHO IS PRO-LIFE, PRO-GUN, PRO-MILITARY, ANTI-OBAMA REGIME IS TIMED TO INTIMIDATE US.
HE MUST BE IMPEACHED..WE MUST RESCUE OUR COUNTRY FROM THE HANDS OF THIS NAZI ANTICHRIST OBAMA AND HIS ARMY OF DEMONS.
GIVE US LIBERTY OR GIVE US DEATH.
G-D PROTECT AMERICA FROM THE OBAMA ANTICHRIST. WE MUST RESIST WITH RIGHTEOUSNESS.
Update:
Some commenters have said the word anti-Christ is too strong. Now I’m Jewish, so I have no idea about what makes an anti-Christ. Therefore I never use this expression either in writing or in person. I’m only quoting my acquaintance, who is Catholic. I personally would describe President Hussein as Muslim black supremacist, hater of America, conservative values, whites, and Jews, who used the race card and media to drag his sorry donkey to where he is now.
April 15th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
Thanks, Zelda. I have no facts to back my supposition, only the long and steady history of how the left acts/reacts. Those who loved dissent so much in the last administration are certainly willing to try to bury any dissent with this one, by ANY means necessary or even thought of.
April 15th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Well, it’s past 6PM Eastern and still there are no reports of violence. It may be offensive to some and for that I apologize, but here goes: Praise God.
April 24th, 2009 at 4:00 am
I’m not criticizing your post, I think it is good to know that there may have been violence this past tax day for the Tea Party attendees such as myself.
However, claiming that Obama is the antichrist is a bit severe. I don’t like the man personally, I love him as a Christian should, but I think that you may be giving him too much credit.
There have been THOUSANDS of ‘antichrist’ accusations in the past 50 years, and obviously, the half of those whom are dead are NOT the antichrist. Not dissing you at all, just trying to continue the furtherance of our minds in Christ.
~Levi
April 24th, 2009 at 10:15 am
Levi, considering Zelda is Jewish, I hardly think she is using the term “antichrist” in the literal biblical sense. It’s more like, “This man’s as evil as we can get without getting into the supernatural or metaphysical.”
And personally, I agree with that. He is an extremely evil person. But then, so are most eloquent megalomaniacs.
April 24th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Levi,
I think I understand your point. However, I was quoting an acquaintance of mine, who is Catholic. I basically copied the message she emailed. This woman based her “anti-Christ” description on the opinions of several priests.
However, to avoid further confusion, I’ll put her message in blockquotes.
May 25th, 2009 at 12:47 am
????????? ???????. ????? ?? ???? ?????, ?????????? ???????? ??? ????????? ???????????. ?? ???????? ????? ???? ????????. ??? ?? ???? ???????? ?????????
September 9th, 2009 at 9:44 am
How can people be so bigoted? get over yourselves
March 31st, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Does Palin Support McCain’s bill—Indefinite Detention of Americans On Mere Suspicion?
On March 4, 2010, Sen. John McCain introduced S.3081, The “Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010.”
Sen. McCain’s S.3081 would eliminate several Constitutional protections allowing Government to arbitrarily pick up Americans on mere suspicion—with no probable cause. Your political opinions and statements made against U.S. Government could be used by Authorities to deem you a “hostile” “Enemy Belligerent” to cause your arrest and indefinite detention.
Considering how often Sarah Palin defends Free Speech, one can’t help wonder why Palin is helping McCain’s reelection to the U.S. Senate after he introduced possibly the most anti-Free Speech Bill in Modern U.S. History? Perhaps Palin or her Tea Party supporters haven’t considered that McCain’s legislation could be used by government to crush them. Tea Parties might question Palin whether she supports Sen. McCain’s bill the “Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010.” (S.3081)
Under S.3081, an “individual” need only be Suspected by Government of “suspicious activity” or “supporting hostilities” to be dragged off and held indefinitely in Military Custody. Government will have the power to detain and interrogate any individual without probable cause. Government need only allege an individual kept in detention, is an Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent suspected of; having engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or has purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners. How could one prove to Government they did not purposely do something? “Materially Supporting Hostilities” against the United States could include any person or group that spoke out or demonstrated disapproval against an agency of U.S. Government. It is foreseeable many Americans might go underground to Resist Government Tyranny. Definition for Unprivileged Enemy Belligerent: (Anyone Subject to a Military Commission)
At least under the Patriot Act, law enforcement generally needed probable cause to detain a person indefinitely. Passage of S.3081 will permit government to use “mere suspicion” to curtail an individual’s Constitutional Protections against unlawful arrest, detention and interrogation without benefit of legal counsel and trial. According to S.3081 Government is not required to provide detained individuals U.S. Miranda Warnings or even an attorney.
S.3081 if passed will frighten Americans from speaking out. S.3081 is so broadly written, it appears any “individual” who writes on the Internet or verbally express an opinion against or an entity of U.S. Government or its coalition partners might be detained on the basis he or she is an “unprivileged enemy belligerent”, “supporting hostilities against U.S. Government.”
How might Americans respond should Government use this bill to take away their loved ones, family members and friends on mere suspicion? It is foreseeable McCain’s bill will drive lawful political activists underground, perhaps creating the domestic terrorists McCain said we needed to be protected from.
McCain’s bill mentions “non-violent acts” supporting terrorism in the U.S. and or emanating from America against a Coalition Partner. Non-violent terrorist acts” are covered in the Patriot Act to prosecute Persons that support “coercion to influence a government or intimidation to affect a civilian population.” However, U.S. activists and individuals under S.3081 would be much more vulnerable to prosecution, if (charged with suspicion) of “intentionally providing support to an Act of Terrorism”, for example American activists cannot control what other activists might do illegally—they network with domestically and overseas. Under the Patriot Act, law enforcement generally needs probable cause to detain or prosecute someone. But under S.3081, law enforcement and the military can too easily use (hearsay or informants) to allege “suspicious activity” to detain an individual. It is problematic under S.3081 that detained individuals in the U.S. not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings or allowed legal counsel will be prosecuted for ordinary crimes because of their alleged admissions while in military custody.
Historically it is foreseeable under S.3081 that “erroneous informant information” will be used to detain innocent Individuals. Other countries have used lying informants to imprison; even execute political opposition.
Notably, McCain’s S.3081 mandates (merging) Federal, State and Local Police and subsequently the U.S. Military to detain and hold Individuals in the U.S., even without probable cause. Interestingly a Rand Report prepared for the Army, recently made public, appears to suggest that U.S. Government develop a Local, State and Federal “National Police Stabilization Force” (merging) State law enforcement with the Feds. What could happen to State Rights and what Laws and Jurisdiction would be used to prosecute state residents arrested by a National Police Stabilization Force? A National Police Force could potentially be sent by the President into any State with the approval of its governor, against the wishes of its Citizens? To clarify the Rand Corporation report visit:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=122533
It should be expected under S.3081 that government would use an individual’s phone call and email information to allege without probable cause “suspicious or hostile activity against the United States to detain Americans.” It does not appear U.S. Government will stop wiretapping Citizens’ electronic communications.
Just recently Pres. Obama’s signed Executive Order EO 12425 that put INTERPOL above the United States Constitution. Obama’s Executive Order authorized INTERPOL to act within the United States without being subject to 4th Amendment Search and Seizure laws. It would appear INTERPOL may now tap American phones and emails without a warrant. And that U.S. Police can use INTERPOL to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to arrest Americans and or forfeit their property by bringing INTERPOL into a criminal or civil investigation. Government can too easily take an innocent person’s hastily written email, fax or phone call out of context to allege “suspicious activity” under S.3081 or that a crime or violation was committed to cause an arrest or Civil Asset Forfeiture.
See McCain Senate bill S.3081 at:
assets.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/politics/ARM10090.pdf
March 31st, 2010 at 8:30 pm
MM — what does bigotry have to do with this post?
Dan, I was also surprised to see Palin campaigning for McCain instead of the true conservative J.D. Hayworth. I did not like the fact that she came out in support of Rand Paul either.
April 13th, 2010 at 9:30 am
It must be so sad, to be so scared.
April 13th, 2010 at 12:38 pm
Consider how law-abiding protest groups in other countries have uncovered and distance themselves from Infiltrators and Provocateurs instigating violence:
In Belfast, Northern Ireland between 1980-1995 Irish Catholics were inundated with British provocateurs whose mission was to marginalize the efforts of lawful Citizens at protests. Provocateurs that joined with lawful groups appeared to be like everyone else, supporting the cause; and would attend meetings to spy on group members, then offer ideas to cause members to break the law; other provocateurs attending meetings would appear law-abiding sometimes offering constructive ideas; then suddenly one day without warning instigate violence at a protest, attacking the opposition at a protest with words, their signs or e.g., throwing rocks. Lawful protest groups to counter the unexpected violence caused by Provocateurs in their midst or those in opposition groups at a protest, came up with the following counter measures: Law-abiding Protest groups appointed “Stewards” that monitored not only their own members but demonstrators in opposition groups at protests: ACTION Taken: When it became apparent at a Protest, someone in their own group was instigating violence or causing a confrontation with the opposition at a Protest, “Stewards” would blow a low pitch whistle; immediately all group members not involved in violence or confrontation would quickly distance themselves many feet from the lawbreakers forming a tight circle, sometimes holding hands, to block out the “instigator” or “Provocateur” from returning or entering their law-abiding circled of Citizens. Meanwhile the “Steward” as a matter of operation always carried a video camera to tape for the record, that their law-abiding members immediately distanced themselves from the “instigator” that caused the confrontation or violence. That videotape might be needed later to prove who was and who wasn’t involved in violence. A copy of the videotape might also be provided to the press to turn the tables on a provocateur or the political opposition. Keep in mind, that a Provocateur hidden in a group at a protest might start a fight with one of their own members or with another member is also a Provocateur; in which case the “steward” would still blow the whistle for law-abiding group members to separate and distance themselves from both group members in the manner described above. Subsequently the group will have to sort out whether the instigator in their group causing confrontation or violence is a Provocateur.