The Urban Grind

Current events, politics and life in general from the perspective of a conservative woman in New York

 

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Michelle Obama Announces A Series Of White House Dance Performances

Michelle Obama is living it up at the White House. After taking six vacations this year, Michelle will be inviting the Alvin Ailey Dancers to the White House for a series of performances. Here’s a photo of the Alvin Ailey dancers.

Here’s a picture of Judith Jameson.

The dancers she’ll be inviting to perform at the White House will be the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater.

Michelle Obama has invited dancers from the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater to the White House.

The performers will kick off a series celebrating American dance on September 7 as part of an event honoring the theater’s artistic director Judith Jameson. The show, starting at 5 p.m. in White House’s East Room, will feature a number of styles, including ballet, contemporary and hip-hop.?

Also showing Judith some love during the event will be performers from the Paul Taylor Dance Company, The Washington Ballet, The New York City Ballet and Super Cr3w from MTV’s “America’s Best Dance Crew.”?

When I read about the Obamas and all their vacations, and stuff like this, I think of the following:

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Ron Paul Hysterically Tears Into Ground Zero Mosque Opponents

No wonder the pedofronters and other white supremacists love this man. He’ll stop at nothing to suck up to fanatical Muslims. Here’s what he had to say to Newsmax TV.

Conservatives are enamored with the idea of having an imperial presence on the world’s stage, with troops stationed around the globe, the elder Paul says. (Oh really? Since when do tax our subjects all over the world like we do in the U.S?)

“They support the war in Afghanistan and Iraq — and actually support plans for intimidating and moving toward war in Iran,” he says. (Has Ron Paul been hiding under a stone for the past few years? If anything, America under Obama has been very accomodating to Iran, so much so that they’re practically nuclear by now. And I hate to break it to the old man, but the Obama administration is also against Israel bombing his beloved Iran.) “They have to have a reason for that, and they can’t say it’s for oil or they can’t say it’s to . . . make them all democrats over there. (Of course it’s not for oil. Otherwise we wouldn’t be paying through the nose for it.)

“You have to have somebody you are willing to hate — you have to have a Hitler to hate.” (Sounds like Dr. Paul is saying that Hitler was nothing more than a bogeyman invented by pro-war Americans of the time.)

Paul believes such advocates are making Muslims that hate target to get Americans to support the wars.

“They have to keep the drumbeat of hate up, so they have to blame the entire religion,” he says. “That’s not everybody . . . that might support or not support building the mosque, because a lot of people just say, ‘That’s bad manners and they shouldn’t do it because they haven’t thought it through.’” (The last time I checked, Pamela Geller was not opposed to mosques being built in New York. She’s just opposed to them building it on Ground Zero, as are most of the protesters.)

Asked whether concerns about the $100 million project’s getting Iranian funding have merit, Paul says: “We never treat anybody else who is building a church or a mosque to check where actually the money is coming from and what everybody believes in. I mean, if something turns up, you deal with it if they break the law.

“But in religion and freedom of speech, you give people the benefit of the doubt.” (As far as I know, Jews and Christians have not gone around hijacking airplanes and blowing themselves up to kill as many innocents as possible.)

Suggesting that the government look into the project’s funding threatens the First Amendment because it would equal censorship, he says. New York GOP gubernatorial candidate Rick Lazio is among those who have urged such an audit. (Where do I even begin with this one?)

“I don’t want government coming in and checking on anything like this, and implying . . . that bad people have supported it,” Paul says.

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

One Lawsuit Against The Arizona Immigration Law That Was Dismissed

At least U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton did one thing right.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit Tuesday by a Tucson police officer who challenged Arizona’s new immigration law.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton says the lawsuit by Officer Martin Escobar alleged an injury that was based on speculation.

Escobar alleged he would be subject to civil liability for violating the rights of others in enforcing the law.

Gov. Jan Brewer’s lawyers asked for the dismissal.

Two of the seven challenges to the law have been dismissed.

Last month, Bolton put the law’s most controversial elements on hold in a case filed by the U.S. Justice Department.

The other five lawsuits remain alive.

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Arizona Files An Appeal On Behalf Of Their Immigration Law

Via Ace of Spades

You go Governor Brewer! She recently filed a brief.

PHOENIX — Gov. Jan Brewer’s lawyers
on Thursday filed the first brief in their appeal of a ruling that put the most controversial elements of Arizona’s new immigration law on hold.

The governor says the federal ruling blocking portions of Arizona’s controversial immigration law “has caused irreparable harm” to the state’s residents.

Brewer wants the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco to reverse the ruling U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton made last month.

The governor’s office says Bolton abused her discretion by applying the wrong legal standards
and basing her ruling on the federal government’s speculation that it would be harmed by Arizona’s law. Brewer says the judge ignored key provisions of federal law that allow states to enforce immigration law.

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Ground Zero Mosque Could Get Public Financing

Unbelievable!

So now New Yorkers may have to pay to have their faces slapped by these fanatical Muslims hell bent on building their victory mosque.

How come there’s no news of public financing for the Greek Orthodox church destroyed on 9/11?

(Reuters) – The Muslim center (Notice how they’re not using the words Ground Zero mosque?) planned near the site of the World Trade Center attack could qualify for tax-free financing, a spokesman for City Comptroller John Liu said on Friday, and Liu is willing to consider approving the public subsidy.

The Democratic comptroller’s spokesman, (Who else but a Democrat would be in favor of such a monstrosity?) Scott Sieber, said Liu supported the project. The center has sparked an intense debate over U.S. religious freedoms and the sanctity of the Trade Center site, where nearly 3,000 perished in the September 11, 2001 attack.

“If it turns out to be financially feasible and if they can demonstrate an ability to pay off the bonds and comply with the laws concerning tax-exempt financing, (Fat chance!) we’d certainly consider it,” Sieber told Reuters.

{snip}

The mosque’s backers hope to raise a total of $70 million in tax-exempt debt to build the center, according to the New York Times. Tax laws allow such funding for religiously affiliated non-profits if they can prove the facility will benefit the general public and their religious activities are funded separately.

The bonds could be issued through a local development corporation created for this purpose, experts said.

The Islamic center would have to repay the bonds, which likely would be less expensive than taxable debt.

New York City’s Industrial Development Authority could not issue debt for the center because the state civic facilities law, which governed this type of financing for non-profits, was allowed to expire about two years ago.

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Meet The Real Estate Developer Behind The Ground Zero Mosque

His name is Sharif El Gamal. It turns out, he’s had many run-ins with the law. Plus, he’s also a tax cheat.

Lovely fellow, huh?

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Obama’s Justice Department Files Yet Another Lawsuit Against Arizona

This time, the suit is against the Phoenix area Maricopa Community Colleges for requiring non-citizens to show green cards in order to be hired for jobs.

The Justice Department filed another lawsuit against immigration practices by Arizona authorities, saying Monday that a network of community colleges acted illegally in requiring noncitizens to provide their green cards before they could be hired for jobs.

{snip}

In Monday’s lawsuit, Justice officials said the colleges discriminated against nearly 250 noncitizen job applicants by mandating that they fill out more documents than required by law to prove their eligibility to work. That violated the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, the department said.

The law’s anti-discrimination provision “makes it unlawful to treat authorized workers differently during the hiring process based on their citizenship status,” said Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for Justice’s Civil Rights Division. He said the government “is acting now to remedy this pattern or practice of discrimination.”

{snip}

The lawsuit was filed Tuesday before the Executive Office for Immigration Review, a Justice Department unit that adjudicates immigration cases. It was filed on behalf of Zainul Singaporewalla, a U.S. permanent resident who was offered a math teaching position at Glendale Community College, part of the Maricopa network.

After filling out a federal form attesting to his immigration status and producing a driver’s license and Social Security card, he was told to complete another form with more immigration-related information, the lawsuit said.

That form required other documents and his green card. When he couldn’t present his green card, the suit said, the college would not process his paperwork and would not let him work.

The government is asking a judge within the Justice Department unit to order the Maricopa colleges to pay a civil penalty of $1,100 for each of the 247 non-U.S.-citizen job applicants it says were required to produce the additional documents. It says the colleges ended the practice in January.

In other words, Obama’s Justice Department is taking the side of an illegal alien, who is stealing American jobs over the very citizens he’s supposed to serve.

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Obama Rats Out Arizona To The U.N. Human Rights Council

Not content to sue an American state trying desperately to protect its citizens and its sovereignty, Obama has now included the controversial Arizona immigration law that was largely gutted (thanks to an activist judge appointed by Bill Clinton) in its first ever report to the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Of course our POTUS had the help of left wing, anti-American organizations in putting together this report.

The report – which now goes to the U.N. for review — was drawn up following a series of consultative sessions between January and April involving federal agencies and civil society organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union, NAACP, American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee and Human Rights First.

The report’s compilation is part of the “universal periodic review” (UPR) process in which the HRC probes every U.N. member-state’s human rights record once every four years.

Here’s what was written about the Arizona immigration law:

– On immigration, the report says the U.S. seeks to build an effective and fair system of enforcement, and last year began a major overhaul of the immigration detention system. It notes ongoing court action contesting the controversial Arizona immigration law. “President Obama remains firmly committed to fixing our broken immigration system, because he recognizes that our ability to innovate, our ties to the world, and our economic prosperity depend on our capacity to welcome and assimilate immigrants.”

Of course the great Arizona Governor Jan Brewer is not taking this lying down. She demanded the White House take back the reference to the Arizona immigration law be taken out of the report to the UNHRC.

In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Brewer says it is “downright offensive” that a state law would be included in the report, which was drafted as part of a UN review of human rights in all member nations every four years.

“The idea of our own American government submitting the duly enacted laws of a state of the United States to ‘review’ by the United Nations is internationalism run amok and unconstitutional,” Brewer wrote.

Here’s what Governor Brewer had to say on the Greta Van Susteren show.

Now while I’m on the subject of the U.N., here’s what one Arizona sherif had to say about them.

(CNSNews.com) – Sheriff Larry Dever, whose officers patrol Cochise County along the border between Arizona and Mexico, said he finds it “amazing” that the U.S. State Department would refer the recently passed immigration law in his state to the United Nations Human Rights Council for review.

“Well, it’s just amazing to me,” Dever told CNSNews.com. “Course, I have about as much regard for the U.N. as I do the vermin that hides in the rocks around my house here and reaches out and tries to bite me every now and then.”

Right on, sir!

Posted by Zelda on 31 Aug 2010

Obama Comes Out In Support of the Ground Zero Mosque Yet Again!

No wonder so many Americans think this man is a Muslim.

Posted by Zelda on 28 Aug 2010

Washington Post Shills For Shariah Law

In this article, the writer insists that Shariah can mean many different things, and that non-Muslims who use the word, are using it as a slur.

Protesters of the proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero waved signs there Sunday with a single word: sharia.

Their reference to Islam’s guiding principles has become a rallying cry for those critical of Islam, who use the word to conjure images of public stonings and other extreme forms of punishment in countries such as Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan and argue that those tenets are somehow gaining a foothold in the United States.

{snip}

Sharia in Arabic means “way” or “path.” Muslims agree that sharia is God’s law, but there is little consensus on the particulars. To some, sharia is a set of rules that are codified and unchanging. To others, it’s a collection of religious principles that shift over time.

Now for those of you who can see past this media bias, here’s exactly what shariah law entails.

1- Jihad, defined as “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion,” is the duty of every Muslim and Muslim head of state (Caliph). Muslim Caliphs who refuse jihad are in violation of Sharia and unfit to rule.

2- A Caliph can hold office through seizure of power meaning through force.

3- A Caliph is exempt from being charged with serious crimes such as murder, adultery, robbery, theft, drinking and in some cases of rape.

4- A percentage of Zakat (charity money) must go towards jihad.

5- It is obligatory to obey the commands of the Caliph, even if he is unjust.

6- A caliph must be a Muslim, a non-slave and a male.

7- The Muslim public must remove the Caliph if he rejects Islam.

8- A Muslim who leaves Islam must be killed immediately.

9- A Muslim will be forgiven for murder of: 1) an apostate 2) an adulterer 3) a highway robber. Vigilante street justice and honor killing is acceptable.

10- A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim, but will get it for killing a Muslim.

11- Sharia never abolished slavery, sexual slavery and highly regulates it. A master will not be punished for killing his slave.

12- Sharia dictates death by stoning, beheading, amputation of limbs, flogging even for crimes of sin such as adultery.

13- Non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims under the law. They must comply to Islamic law if they are to remain safe. They are forbidden to marry Muslim women, publicly display wine or pork, recite their scriptures or openly celebrate their religious holidays or funerals. They are forbidden from building new churches or building them higher than mosques. They may not enter a mosque without permission. A non-Muslim is no longer protected if he leads a Muslim away from Islam.

14- It is a crime for a non-Muslim to sell weapons to someone who will use them against Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot curse a Muslim, say anything derogatory about Allah, the Prophet, or Islam, or expose the weak points of Muslims. But Muslims can curse non-Muslims.

15- A non-Muslim cannot inherit from a Muslim.

16- Banks must be Sharia compliant and interest is not allowed.

17- No testimony in court is acceptable from people of low-level jobs, such as street sweepers or bathhouse attendants. Women in low level jobs such as professional funeral mourners cannot keep custody of their children in case of divorce.

18- A non-Muslim cannot rule — even over a non-Muslim minority.

19- Homosexuality is punishable by death.

20- There is no age limit for marriage of girls. The marriage contract can take place anytime after birth and can be consummated at age 8 or 9.

21- Rebelliousness on the part of the wife nullifies the husband’s obligation to support her, gives him permission to beat her and keep her from leaving the home.

22- Divorce is only in the hands of the husband and is as easy as saying: “I divorce you” and becomes effective even if the husband did not intend it.

23- There is no community property between husband and wife and the husband’s property does not automatically go to the wife after his death.

24- A woman inherits half what a man inherits.

25- A man has the right to have up to 4 wives and none of them have a right to divorce him — even if he is polygamous.

26- The dowry is given in exchange for the woman’s sexual organs.

27- A man is allowed to have sex with slave women and women captured in battle, and if the enslaved woman is married her marriage is annulled.

28- The testimony of a woman in court is half the value of a man.

29- A woman loses custody if she remarries.

30- To prove rape, a woman must have 4 male witnesses.

31- A rapist may only be required to pay the bride-money (dowry) without marrying the rape victim.

32- A Muslim woman must cover every inch of her body, which is considered “Awrah,” a sexual organ. Not all Sharia schools allow the face of a woman exposed.

33- A Muslim man is forgiven if he kills his wife at the time he caught her in the act of adultery. However, the opposite is not true for women, since the man “could be married to the woman he was caught with.”

34-It is obligatory for a Muslim to lie if the purpose is obligatory. That means that for the sake of abiding with Islam’s commandments, such as jihad, a Muslim is obliged to lie and should not have any feelings of guilt or shame associated with this kind of lying.

The above are clear-cut laws in Islam decided by great Imams after years of examination and interpretation of the Quran, Hadith and Mohammed’s life. Now let the learned Imam Rauf tell us: What part of the above is compliant with the U.S. Constitution?

Many sports bettors first come to SportsBettingWorld.com to get expert opinion on game match-ups before they go ahead and bet. That's because all their picks are made by expert handicappers with a terrific record.

 

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

Meta

Everywhere Else

New York Bloggers

Other Sites of Interest

Text Links From Sponsors

Resources

Research Avesil reviews and more
http://www.wikio.com

2007 Weblog Awards Finalist

The 2007 Weblog Awards

Check Out Some Sponsors!

Categories